Food comparison

Sweet Potato vs Russet Potato

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Sweet Potatoes vs Russet Potato: nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gSweet PotatoesRusset Potato
Calories79 kcal83 kcal
Protein1.6 g2.3 g
Carbohydrate17.3 g17.8 g
Fat0.4 g0.4 g
Fibre4.4 g14.9 g
AllergensNone listedNone listed
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientSweet PotatoesRusset Potato
Calcium, Ca22.33 mg7.8 mg
Copper, Cu0.19 mg0.09 mg
Iron, Fe0.4 mg0.38 mg
Magnesium, Mg19.14 mg25.64 mg
Manganese, Mn0.42 mg0.15 mg
Niacin0.43 mg1.5 mg
Phosphorus, P36.73 mg55.19 mg
Potassium, K486.4 mg450.1 mg
Sodium, Na0 mg2.74 mg
Thiamin0.05 mg0.07 mg
Vitamin B-60.12 mg0.16 mg
Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid14.84 mg10.9 mg
Zinc, Zn0.34 mg0.38 mg
How they differ

Russet Potato is higher in fibre. Reach for Russet Potato when you want more fibre for fullness and digestion.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Sweet Potatoes provides 79 kcal, 1.6 g protein and 17.3 g carbohydrate; Russet Potato provides 83 kcal, 2.3 g protein and 17.8 g carbohydrate.

That is a difference of 4 kcal per 100 g — small next to what the cooking method adds.

Calorie-wise these two are close enough that the swap is rarely about numbers. Sweet potato brings beta-carotene and a natural sweetness that stands up to roasting; russet is starchy and floury, which is exactly why it bakes and mashes the way it does. They behave differently in the oven, so recipes are not interchangeable without adjusting time.

In short: sweet potato is the lighter option per 100 g, but with vegetables the choice is usually about texture and how they cook, not calories.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.

Continue exploring

Related comparisons

View all