Food comparison

Hummus vs Chickpeas

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Hummus vs Canned Chickpeas: nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gHummusCanned Chickpeas
Calories229 kcal137 kcal
Protein7.4 g7 g
Carbohydrate14.9 g20.3 g
Fat17.1 g3.1 g
Fibre5.4 g5.9 g
AllergensNone listedNone listed
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientHummusCanned Chickpeas
Calcium, Ca41 mg40.48 mg
Copper, Cu0.35 mg0.27 mg
Iron, Fe2.41 mg1.04 mg
Magnesium, Mg71.1 mg28.41 mg
Manganese, Mn1.06 mg0.74 mg
Phosphorus, P166 mg86.48 mg
Potassium, K289 mg136.8 mg
Sodium, Na438 mg201.7 mg
Zinc, Zn1.38 mg0.72 mg
How they differ

Hummus is higher in fat. Canned Chickpeas is higher in carbohydrate, and the leaner, lower-calorie choice. That makes Hummus more relevant when you want a richer, higher-fat option, and Canned Chickpeas when you want quicker-energy carbohydrate.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Hummus provides 229 kcal, 7.4 g protein, 14.9 g carbohydrate and 17.1 g fat; Canned Chickpeas provides 137 kcal, 7 g protein, 20.3 g carbohydrate and 3.1 g fat.

That is a difference of 92 kcal per 100 g, before anything is added in the pan.

Hummus is chickpeas plus tahini and oil, and the oil is what moves the numbers: the fat per 100 g is several times higher than the beans it is made from. Neither is better in the abstract — one is a dip and the other is an ingredient, and they rarely compete on the same plate.

In short: for protein per calorie, chickpeas. If that is not the deciding factor, pick by the dish, the price and how you plan to cook it.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.

Continue exploring

Related comparisons

View all