Food comparison

Beef Chuck vs Beef Round

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Beef (Chuck, Raw) vs Beef (Round, Raw): nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gBeef (Chuck, Raw)Beef (Round, Raw)
Calories232 kcal122 kcal
Protein18.4 g23.4 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Fat17.8 g2.5 g
Fibre0 g0 g
AllergensNone listedNone listed
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientBeef (Chuck, Raw)Beef (Round, Raw)
Calcium, Ca4.58 mg13 mg
Copper, Cu0.05 mg0.04 mg
Iron, Fe2.06 mg1.37 mg
Magnesium, Mg16.99 mg11.4 mg
Manganese, Mn0 mg0 mg
Phosphorus, P151 mg222 mg
Potassium, K281.1 mg312 mg
Sodium, Na48.44 mg50 mg
Zinc, Zn5.39 mg3.38 mg
How they differ

Beef (Chuck, Raw) is higher in fat. Beef (Round, Raw) is higher in protein, and the leaner, lower-calorie choice. That makes Beef (Chuck, Raw) more relevant when you want a richer, higher-fat option, and Beef (Round, Raw) when you want protein for fullness or recovery.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Beef (Chuck, Raw) provides 232 kcal, 18.4 g protein and 17.8 g fat; Beef (Round, Raw) provides 122 kcal, 23.4 g protein and 2.5 g fat.

That is a difference of 110 kcal and 15.3 g of fat per 100 g, before anything is added in the pan.

These two are not interchangeable, and the difference is time. Chuck has the connective tissue that melts into a braise over hours and makes a stew taste like a stew. Round is lean and dries out in that same pot; it belongs in thin slices, roasted quickly or seared for a stir-fry.

In short: for protein per calorie, round. If that is not the deciding factor, pick by the dish, the price and how you plan to cook it.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.

Continue exploring

Related comparisons

View all