Food comparison

Salmon vs Tilapia

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Salmon vs Tilapia: nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gSalmonTilapia
Calories130 kcal95 kcal
Protein22.3 g19 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Fat4.9 g2.5 g
Fibre0 g0 g
AllergensFishFish
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientSalmonTilapia
Calcium, Ca14.84 mg8.63 mg
Copper, Cu0.06 mg0 mg
Iron, Fe0.4 mg0 mg
Magnesium, Mg26.15 mg24.28 mg
Manganese, Mn0 mg0.01 mg
Phosphorus, P226.3 mg159.4 mg
Potassium, K329.7 mg342.4 mg
Selenium, Se30.2 ug20.51 ug
Sodium, Na53.3 mg93.66 mg
Vitamin B-125.16 ug0.76 ug
Zinc, Zn0.42 mg0.3 mg
How they differ

Salmon is higher in protein and fat. Tilapia is the leaner, lower-calorie choice. That makes Salmon more relevant when you want protein for fullness or recovery, and Tilapia when you want a lighter, lower-calorie option.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Salmon provides 130 kcal, 22.3 g protein, 0 g carbohydrate, 4.9 g fat and 0 g fiber; Tilapia provides 95 kcal, 19 g protein, 0 g carbohydrate, 2.5 g fat and 0 g fiber.

Looking beyond the macronutrients, Salmon is the better source of vitamin B12 (see the vitamins and minerals table below).

Salmon is fattier, and that fat is where the long-chain omega-3s EPA and DHA come from — tilapia has very little. Salmon also brings far more vitamin D and B12. Tilapia is the lower-calorie, milder-tasting option.

In short: for weight loss or a bigger portion at the same calories, Tilapia; for protein and muscle, Salmon. If none of those goals applies, pick by taste, price and what the recipe needs.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.