Food comparison

Pollock vs Tilapia

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Alaska Pollock (Raw) vs Tilapia (Raw): nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gAlaska Pollock (Raw)Tilapia (Raw)
Calories78 kcal95 kcal
Protein17.3 g19 g
Carbohydrate0.1 g0 g
Fat1 g2.5 g
Fibre0 g0 g
AllergensFishFish
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientAlaska Pollock (Raw)Tilapia (Raw)
Calcium, Ca40.36 mg8.63 mg
Copper, Cu0.1 mg0 mg
Iron, Fe0.24 mg0 mg
Magnesium, Mg22.82 mg24.28 mg
Manganese, Mn0 mg0.01 mg
Phosphorus, P223.2 mg159.4 mg
Potassium, K353 mg342.4 mg
Selenium, Se27 ug20.51 ug
Sodium, Na114.8 mg93.66 mg
Vitamin B-121.76 ug0.76 ug
Zinc, Zn0.43 mg0.3 mg
How they differ

Alaska Pollock (Raw) is the leaner, lower-calorie choice. Tilapia (Raw) is higher in fat. That makes Alaska Pollock (Raw) more relevant when you want a lighter, lower-calorie option, and Tilapia (Raw) when you want a richer, higher-fat option.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Alaska Pollock provides 78 kcal, 17.3 g protein, 0 g carbohydrate and 0.8 g fat; Tilapia provides 96 kcal, 20.1 g protein, 0 g carbohydrate and 1.7 g fat.

That is a difference of 18 kcal per 100 g, before anything is added in the pan.

These two compete for the same job: cheap, mild, white and freezer-friendly. Tilapia carries slightly more protein per 100 g; pollock is what most frozen fish sticks and fast-food fillets are actually made of. Both need seasoning and neither has much flavour to lose.

In short: for protein per calorie, pollock. If that is not the deciding factor, pick by the dish, the price and how you plan to cook it.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.

Continue exploring

Related comparisons

View all