Food comparison

Buckwheat vs Millet

Compared on one consistent basis: per 100 g, from USDA data behind each food page.

Buckwheat vs Millet: nutrition per 100 g

Per 100 gBuckwheatMillet
Calories356 kcal376 kcal
Protein11.1 g10 g
Carbohydrate71.1 g74.4 g
Fat3 g4.2 g
Fibre4 g2.6 g
AllergensNone listedNone listed
Vitamins and minerals per 100 g
NutrientBuckwheatMillet
Calcium, Ca13.64 mg9.11 mg
Copper, Cu0.48 mg0.49 mg
Folate, DFE30 ug85 ug
Folate, food30 ug85 ug
Folate, total30 ug85 ug
Iron, Fe2.44 mg2.53 mg
Magnesium, Mg203 mg105.5 mg
Manganese, Mn1.23 mg0.92 mg
Niacin5.37 mg4.86 mg
Pantothenic acid1.23 mg0.85 mg
Phosphorus, P373.7 mg257.9 mg
Potassium, K414.5 mg214.1 mg
Riboflavin0.18 mg0.14 mg
Selenium, Se13.6 ug23.1 ug
Thiamin0.54 mg0.41 mg
Vitamin B-60.28 mg0.19 mg
Zinc, Zn2.24 mg2.26 mg
How they differ

Buckwheat is higher in fibre. Millet is higher in fat. That makes Buckwheat more relevant when you want more fibre for fullness and digestion, and Millet when you want a richer, higher-fat option.

Bottom line

Per 100 g, Buckwheat provides 356 kcal, 11.1 g protein, 71.1 g carbohydrate, 3 g fat and 4 g fiber; Millet provides 376 kcal, 10 g protein, 74.4 g carbohydrate, 4.2 g fat and 2.6 g fiber.

Looking beyond the macronutrients, Buckwheat is the better source of potassium, magnesium, while Millet is the better source of folate, selenium (see the vitamins and minerals table below).

Both gluten-free. Buckwheat has nearly double the magnesium and potassium and more fiber; millet has more folate and selenium and cooks a little faster.

In short: for fiber and digestion, Buckwheat. If none of those goals applies, pick by taste, price and what the recipe needs.

Want a different pair? Use the food comparison tool to compare any two foods from the same category.

Values are per 100 g from the USDA FoodData Central records behind each food page and are rounded; brands and preparation change the numbers. This comparison is educational, not medical advice.